Reconfiguring the Outcomes of Simbahayan: The Case Study of Basic Ecclesial Communities in the Diocese of Imus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v15i2.222Keywords:
Simbahayan, Basic Ecclesial Communities, Gated Communities, Organizational Outcomes, Organizational ContextsAbstract
This article examines Basic Ecclesial Communities (BECs), or Simbahayan, of the Catholic Church as a social organization. The term Simbahayan comes from two joined Tagalog words: simbahan (church) and pamayanan (community). Rooted in these two social institutions, the Simbahayan represents a convergence of ecclesial and communal life, linking the Church with other social units. This study explores how the Simbahayan organize to achieve outcomes within gated communities and how organizational contexts shape these outcomes. This qualitative case study, conducted in the Diocese of Imus, used key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and a review of parish documents to examine the organizational context. All data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke (2024) and triangulated (Denzin, 2009). Data collection was conducted with the parish priest's approval and informed consent from all participants. This study highlighted a geographical form of Simbahayan within gated communities, where the heterogeneity of lay leaders and members significantly contributes to fulfilling both the material and spiritual outcomes of the organization. The enabling organizational contexts identified in this study are strong interorganizational relationships, members’ support system, and mutual resource dependence. The constraining organizational contexts identified are the absence of formalized BEC guidelines, challenges in ecclesial interministerial coordination, fragmentation, low participation, and structural problems within the Simbahayan. The study recommends ways forward to achieve recognized Simbahayan outcomes, including leadership succession planning, organizational effectiveness, and establishing a parish discernment team to support the continuity and re-engineering of the Simbahayan structure.
Downloads
References
Acts and Decrees of the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines. (1991). Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP), Paulines Publications, 52. Retrieved from https://cbcponline.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Acts-and-Decrees-of-the-Second-Plenary-Council of-the-Philippines-PCP-II-Book-5.pdf
Aldrich, H., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.000455
Atkinson, R., & Blandy, S. (2005). Introduction: International perspectives on the new enclavism and the rise of gated communities. Housing Studies, 20(2), 177–186.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0267303042000331718
Basas, A. A. (2019). Refiguring the Ecclesiology of the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines for Filipino Catholics. Philippiniana Sacra, 54(161), 3-22.
Bertalanffy, L. V. (1950). An outline of general system theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1(2), 134–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/I.2.134
Blakely, E. J., & Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470755679.ch15
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). Supporting Best Practice in Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting in Palliative Medicine: A Review of Published Research and Introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). Palliative Medicine 38(6):608–16. doi:10.1177/02692163241234800.
Clata, Henzel P. (2022). The Creation and Carrying on of GKK St. Therese of Avila Purok 17-B FVR Village, Barangay Fatima, General Santos City. History Department, Social Sciences and Humanities. Thesis Repository.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95–S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among five approaches, 96. Sage Publications.
Dagmang, F. D. (2016). Basic Ecclesial Communities: An Evaluation of the Acts and Decrees of the Second Plenary Council of the Philippines in Ten Parishes in the Philippines. Under the auspices of Missio-Munich, Germany.
Dagmang, F. (2022). Geography, Society, and Culture: Enablers (or Inhibitors) of Basic Ecclesial Community Development. MST Review, 24(1), 1-36. https://mstreview.com/index.php/mst/article/view/678/501
Davao Catholic Herald (May 16, 2015). Mudiang GKK’s Decades of Unity. Archdiocese of Davao, Local News. Davao Catholic Herald Worshipping, Teaching and Serving. Retrieved from https://www.davaocatholicherald.com/2015/05/mudiang-gkks-decades-of unity/?utm_source
Delgado, J., M. Gabriel, E. Padilla, & A. Picardal. (2004). BECS in the Philippines, Dream or Reality: A Multi-Disciplinary Reflection. Taytay, Rizal: Lexicon Press.
Denzin, N. K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chapter 12. Strategies of Triangulation and the Art of Doing Sociology. Routledge, Preview, 27 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Discernment Guide from the Diocese of Imus Lay Formation Office. https://dioceseofimus.org/dppe/pastoral-integration/1
Fernandez, S.A. Z.; Echano, J.O.; & Rañola, R.T.L. (2024). Basic Ecclesial Communities in the Philippines. Histories and Stories of a Pilgrim Church. Catholic Bishop’s Conference of the Philippines Publication.
Fujii, L. A. (2017). Interviewing in Social Science Research: A Relational Approach. Routledge.
Gabriel, M. G. (2021). A Continuing Pastoral Accompaniment of Basic Ecclesial Communities in the Philippines. A 50-Year Journey. Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines Publication.
Gaspar, Karl M. (2016). Basic Ecclesial Communities In Mindanao: A Call to Continuing Missiological Relevance. MST Review 19 no. 1 (2016): 37-66. https://mstreview.com/index.php/mst/article/view/604/444
Glisson, C. (2002). The Organizational Context of Children’s Mental Health Services. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, Vol. 5, No. 4. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023/A:1020972906177.pdf
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
Ignacio, L. B., & Fuego, J. H. (2017). Rights and fights: the role of homeowners association (HOA) as compared to local government units (LGU) in providing services to residents of gated community. International Journal of Real Estate Studies, 11(1), 11-27.
Jiang, K., Lepak, D. P., Hu, J., & Baer, J. C. (2012). How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1264-1294.
Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815447
Luciani, R. (2022). Synodality: A New Way of Proceeding in the Church. Paulist Press.
Mangada, L. L., & Cuaton, G. P. (2022). Typhoon Haiyan Survivors at Resettlement Sites: COVID-19 Pandemic Realities and Challenges. Dialogues in Health, 1, Article 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100005
Mendoza, F. (2005). Basic Ecclesial Communities: The Context and Foundations Formation. Mandaue City: Mandaue Printshop Corporation,
Mulvenna, M., Boger, J., & Bond, R. (2017, September). Ethical by design: A manifesto. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 51–54). DOI: 10.1145/3121283.3121300.
Nadeau, Kathy. (1999). ‘Beyond the Dumping Ground’: A Critique of the Basic Ecclesial Community Model as a Strategy for Development in an Urban Site. Human Organization 58/2 (1999): 153–160.
Ocampo, M. P. (2018). Church as Basic Ecclesial Communities: A Quick Survey of the BECs in the Philippines (Unpublished term paper). Loyola School of Theology, Philippines.
Ocampo, R. A. SJ. (1994). Pastoral Implication of BEC A commentary to PC II text. Landas, 8, 27-35. https://lst.edu/wp-content/uploads/1994/08/PCPIIOcampoPastoralBECs.pdf
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. A. (1992). Reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Padilla, Estela P. (2004). BEC Spirituality. BECs in the Philippines: Dream or Reality: A Multidisciplinary Reflection. Taytay, Rizal: Bukal ng Tipan by Lexicon Press.
Picardal, A. L. (1999). Building Basic Ecclesial Communities: Ecclesiological Vision, Strategic Framework, Implication for Priestly Ministry. Davao City, Philippines: Redemptorist Publications.
Picardal, A. L. (2014). “Basic Ecclesial Communities in the Philippines: A Reception and Realization of the Vatican II Vision of a Renewed Church.” Hapag Vol. 11, No.1, 127-151
Picardal, A. L. (2016). Basic Ecclesial Communities in the Philippines: A Reception of Vatican II Ecclesiology. In Journeying Towards a New Way of Being Church: Basic
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. N. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990
Roman Catholic Diocese of Imus. Cluster of Communities. Simbahayan. Retrieved from https://www.dioceseofimus.org/dppe/community/1
Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2015). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural and open systems perspectives. Routledge.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Teofilo Viray

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.




