Philosophy of Language and the Law in H.L.A. Hart’s Legal Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57106/scientia.v14i1.194Keywords:
H.L.A. Hart, philosophy of language, legal interpretation, philosophy of law, jurisprudence, vagueness in law and languageAbstract
H.L.A. Hart, in his famous work, The Concept of Law, which is considered one of the most influential texts of analytical jurisprudence, emphasizes that many central problems in legal philosophy depend on an adequate understanding of language. He argues that the philosophy of language is foundational to the philosophy of law. Influenced by J.L. Austin and Ludwig Wittgenstein, Hart asserts that understanding the ordinary use of words in specific contexts is crucial for interpreting laws. It is undeniably true that lawmakers, judges, legal philosophers, and jurists frequently turn to disciplines focused on the meaning and interpretation of words. This paper examines Hart’s perspective on the role of the philosophy of language in jurisprudence and explores how he addresses issues of legal interpretation through this framework. It argues that the philosophy of language is essential to determining the scope of reasonable interpretation. A well-developed philosophical understanding of meaning and usage greatly benefits legal philosophy. Accordingly, this paper highlights its critical role in understanding the nature of law.
Downloads
References
Austin, J.L. (1961). Philosophical papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
__________. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bentham, J. (1782). Of laws in general. London: Athlone Press.
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Hart, H.L.A. (1954). Definition and theory in jurisprudence. Law Quarterly Review 70:37-60.
__________. (1958). Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Harvard Law Review 71:
593-629.
__________.(1982). Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and political theory. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
__________.(1983). Essays in jurisprudence and philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
__________.(1994). The concept of law, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
__________.(2012). The concept of law, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hutton, C. (2009). Language, meaning and the law. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Marmor, A. (2008). The pragmatics of legal language. Ratio Juris 21: 423-452.
__________. (2014). The language of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Raz, J. (1990). Practical reason and norms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Soames, S. (2008). Interpreting legal texts: What is, and what is not, special about the law. In
Philosophical essays volume 1: Natural language: What it means and how we use it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
__________. and Marmor, A. (2011). Philosophical foundations of language in the law. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations. trans. G.E.M. Ascombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Joseph Paña

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.