John Searle and the Is-Ought Problem

Abstract

References

Anscombe, G. E. M. "Brute Facts." Analysis 18, no. 13 (1958).

Anscombe, G. E. M. "Modern Moral Philosophy." Philosophy 33, no. 124 (1958).

Foot, Philippa. "Moral Arguments." Mind 67, no. 268 (1958).

Hare, R. M. The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959.

Hume, David. A treatise of human nature. London: Penguin Books,1965/1740.

Joaquin, Jeremiah Joven. "Dissolving the is-ought problem: An essay on moral
reasoning." Philpapers: Online Research in Philosophy. February
5, 2010. http://philpapers.org archive/JOADTI.1.pdf (accessed August
18, 2010).

MacIntyre, A. C. "Hume on “is” and “ought”." Philosophical Review 67, no. 4 (1959).

Nowell-Smith, P. H. Ethics. London: Penguin, 1954.

Prior, A. N. The logic and basis of ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1949.

Searle, John. "How to derive an "ought" from and "is"." The Philosophical Review
73, no. 1 (1964): 43-58.

Williams, Bernard. "Aristotle on the good: A formal sketch." Philosophical
Quarterly 12, no. 49 (1962).